Monthly Archives: January 2018

Samsung Galaxy S9, Galaxy S9 Plus memory configurations leaked: Report

Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus have seen quite a few leaks, especially on China’s Weibo platform. Now, another leak claims to have put out the RAM and storage configurations of the upcoming Samsung flagship smartphones. According to earlier leaks, Samsung was supposed to showcase Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus at CES 2018, but this has not happened. Samsung might just reveal the phones at MWC 2018 in Barcelona, or we could see a March launch timeline for the Galaxy S9 series like with the previous Galaxy S8 smartphones.

According to the latest leak posted on Weibo, Samsung Galaxy S9 will come with two options: 4GB RAM and 64GB storage and 4GB RAM with 128GB storage. The Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus on the other hand, will come with 6GB RAM and three storage variants: 64GB, 128GB, and 256GB. It also claims Samsung might push a 512GB model of the phone, though this could be temporary and offered only in select markets, claims the Weibo post.

SamMobile which has also reported on the leak, says this can be seen as confirmation that Galaxy S9 might not actually end up with the dual rear camera. Previous leaks have claimed Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus will get the dual rear camera and not the smaller device. Samsung is expected to stick with the Infinity display on the S9 series.

Samsung Galaxy S9 will be powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor in the US, while in India and other international markets, it will come with the company’s own Exynos 9810 processor. Samsung has in the past introduced higher RAM and storage variants for the Galaxy S8 Plus and Note 8 as well, so it might do the same with the Galaxy S9 series.

Honor View10 review: A smartphone that aces the mid-tier flagship race

Chinese smartphone maker unveiled the Mate 10-series, powered by its flagship artificial intelligence-based Kirin 970 system on chip, in its home country last year. Like the previous Mate-series devices, the Mate10-series phones were released in only a handful of markets – and the price-conscious Indian smartphone market was not one of them.
However, Huawei’s online sub-brand has launched in India the View10, an affordable version designed on the footprints of the Mate 10-series, at Rs 29,999. The is Honor’s third launch at this price – the 8 and 8 Pro were the previous two.
The features the company’s latest Kirin 970 processor, which boasts a neural-processing unit for wizardry. The phone comes with 6GB RAM and 128 GB internal storage packed inside a sturdy metallic body reminiscent of the 8 Pro. The key attraction of the device is its dual-camera set-up on the back and the futuristic 18:9 aspect ratio screen.
Business Standard reviewed the to test the phone’s hardware and software prowess, besides the overall smartphone performance. Here are our observations:Despite a 5.99-inch screen, the is narrower than the 8 Pro, which had a 5.7-inch screen; in terms of height and thickness, it has retained the dimensions of the predecessor. The screen has been stretched to fit the 18:9 aspect ratio which leaves limited space for bezels. The screen resolution has been reduced from quadHD (1440 x 2560) in the 8 Pro to fullHD+ (1080 x 2160) in the  That does affect the pixel counts of the otherwise capable display.Talking of the overall design, the front is now dominated by the 18:9 aspect ratio screen and a fingerprint scanner embedded under the home key, which is placed on the limited bottom bezel space. While the front sees a major improvement and looks better, the back looks a tad bland, reminiscent of the 8 Pro design. The protruding camera lenses, coupled with prominent antenna lines on top and bottom, temper the overall design theme.
has a history of using dual-camera set-ups; it is among the first few smartphone manufacturers to introduce the concept in mobile phones. Besides, the company has a dedicated series of smartphones – the P-series – that boasts industry-first dual-camera set-up co-created in partnership with imaging experts ‘Leica’.
The approach of different manufacturers to the dual-camera set-up is different, and opted for a monochrome sensor, mated with a regular RGB-based primary sensor, to power its two rear cameras. For the camera-centric P-series and Mate-series smartphones, the camera performance is fine-tuned on the basis of algorithms co-designed by and  However, for an all-rounder device like the View10, the company has relied on internal engineering and, therefore, the phone brings a capable dual-camera set-up minus the branding and some software goodies that are limited to the P-series and Mate-series smartphones.
The utilises a 16-megapixel RGB camera sensor, coupled with a 20MP monochrome lens, with a bright f/1.8 aperture. In the View10, the camera carries the advantage of the processor’s AI-based NPU to improve imaging capabilities, which are prominent in the Bokeh (portrait included) and AI modes. The camera delivers a consistent performance during day-light conditions, but getting the night shots right takes some effort – especially if you are not using the flash. You need to tweak the settings and select the right mode. The focus is a little out of touch and not the fastest we have seen in mid-range flagships like the OnePlus 5T.
The front camera houses a 13MP sensor, backed by the AI-based Bokeh mode that also has a beauty mode. The beauty mode works as intended, but the Bokeh is not a success story every time. It works mostly but causes artificial blurring on portrait’s edges which looks out of place.The powering the is a powerhouse. The phone’s performance is top-notch, with no visible lags or slowdowns anywhere. The handles multitasking, background operations and multiple apps working in the background with ease. Graphic-intensive games like Need for Speed and Asphalt 8 work like a charm at the maximum graphic setting.
The phone boots Android Oreo 8.0 covered under the highly customised EMUI 8.0 theme, which comes packed with a host of features. EMUI offers a lot of scope for customisation, but the theme, visibly inspired by Apple’s iOS, does little good with Android. For example, there are no on-screen or capacitive navigation keys. The home key doubles up as the back and recent app keys. Long pressing the home button takes you to home; swiping left or right opens the recent app window; and a single touch on home key works as the back button. It takes some time to get used to the set-up, but the overall Android operating system just does not feel as swift as the iOS for single-button usage.
Powering all the action is a 3,750 mAh battery that easily keeps the show running for more than a day, even after intensive use. The phone comes bundled with a fast charger that replenishes the battery fairly quickly.The is an all-rounder with a clear edge over other mid-tier flagships in terms of imaging, performance and battery life. It does not feel as plush as OnePlus 5T but offers a solid all-round performance, which can potentially leave the OnePlus flagship behind. Priced competitively at Rs 29,999, the phone offers a futuristic screen, a dual-camera set-up and a top-notch processor that justifies the cost in every sense.

It takes 17 hours for an image to burn in on the iPhone X, test shows

Korean tech site and phone marketplace Cetizen tested OLED displays on the iPhone X, the Samsung Galaxy Note 8, and the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge for 510 hours to measure burn-in as part of its ongoing iPhone X review. In all three cases, maintaining a static image for far longer than a normal use case was necessary to produce noticeable burn-in. The iPhone X took longer to exhibit distracting burn-in than the other two phones.

The site left the phone screens displaying a static image at maximum brightness for the test’s entire duration. The iPhone X first showed signs of burn-in at 17 hours, but even then the image retention was not bad enough to be noticeable in normal use. The Galaxy Note 8 took longer to exhibit retention, but by 62 hours it was more significant than what was seen on the iPhone X, such that a general user could identify the burned-in spots on the Note 8 at that time, but not on the iPhone X.

By the end of the 510-hour test, all three phones had very noticeable image retention that could potentially be permanent. Cetizen did not report trying any methods of clearing the image up. In OLED TVs, retention can occur after several hours—especially with things like network logos on broadcast TV, or persistent UI elements in video games—but it is usually easily reversible with the help of image retention remedies included in the TV’s software. But the OLED panels in phones are made very differently than those in TVs, so it’s unclear how much the retention is reversible in phones. It could vary from device to device.

All told, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge performed almost, but not quite, as well as the iPhone X, and the Note 8 exhibited the worst retention. When we reviewed the iPhone X, Apple told us that it had implemented certain anti-retention measures in addition to its usual fine-tuning of the iPhone display. But the company didn’t disclose what those measures were. Whatever they were, this comparison suggests they were at least somewhat effective.

None of these three phones performed poorly enough in this test that owners should be worried. It seems that with high-quality panels made by Samsung (the iPhone X uses a Samsung-manufactured panel), OLED display technology has overcome some of its most concerning problems. LG’s phone panels might still be a different story—for now.