Samsung Galaxy S9, Galaxy S9 Plus memory configurations leaked: Report
Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus have seen quite a few leaks, especially on China’s Weibo platform. Now, another leak claims to have put out the RAM and storage configurations of the upcoming Samsung flagship smartphones. According to earlier leaks, Samsung was supposed to showcase Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus at CES 2018, but this has not happened. Samsung might just reveal the phones at MWC 2018 in Barcelona, or we could see a March launch timeline for the Galaxy S9 series like with the previous Galaxy S8 smartphones.
According to the latest leak posted on Weibo, Samsung Galaxy S9 will come with two options: 4GB RAM and 64GB storage and 4GB RAM with 128GB storage. The Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus on the other hand, will come with 6GB RAM and three storage variants: 64GB, 128GB, and 256GB. It also claims Samsung might push a 512GB model of the phone, though this could be temporary and offered only in select markets, claims the Weibo post.
SamMobile which has also reported on the leak, says this can be seen as confirmation that Galaxy S9 might not actually end up with the dual rear camera. Previous leaks have claimed Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus will get the dual rear camera and not the smaller device. Samsung is expected to stick with the Infinity display on the S9 series.
Samsung Galaxy S9 will be powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor in the US, while in India and other international markets, it will come with the company’s own Exynos 9810 processor. Samsung has in the past introduced higher RAM and storage variants for the Galaxy S8 Plus and Note 8 as well, so it might do the same with the Galaxy S9 series.
Honor View10 review: A smartphone that aces the mid-tier flagship race
It takes 17 hours for an image to burn in on the iPhone X, test shows
Korean tech site and phone marketplace Cetizen tested OLED displays on the iPhone X, the Samsung Galaxy Note 8, and the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge for 510 hours to measure burn-in as part of its ongoing iPhone X review. In all three cases, maintaining a static image for far longer than a normal use case was necessary to produce noticeable burn-in. The iPhone X took longer to exhibit distracting burn-in than the other two phones.
The site left the phone screens displaying a static image at maximum brightness for the test’s entire duration. The iPhone X first showed signs of burn-in at 17 hours, but even then the image retention was not bad enough to be noticeable in normal use. The Galaxy Note 8 took longer to exhibit retention, but by 62 hours it was more significant than what was seen on the iPhone X, such that a general user could identify the burned-in spots on the Note 8 at that time, but not on the iPhone X.
By the end of the 510-hour test, all three phones had very noticeable image retention that could potentially be permanent. Cetizen did not report trying any methods of clearing the image up. In OLED TVs, retention can occur after several hours—especially with things like network logos on broadcast TV, or persistent UI elements in video games—but it is usually easily reversible with the help of image retention remedies included in the TV’s software. But the OLED panels in phones are made very differently than those in TVs, so it’s unclear how much the retention is reversible in phones. It could vary from device to device.
All told, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge performed almost, but not quite, as well as the iPhone X, and the Note 8 exhibited the worst retention. When we reviewed the iPhone X, Apple told us that it had implemented certain anti-retention measures in addition to its usual fine-tuning of the iPhone display. But the company didn’t disclose what those measures were. Whatever they were, this comparison suggests they were at least somewhat effective.
None of these three phones performed poorly enough in this test that owners should be worried. It seems that with high-quality panels made by Samsung (the iPhone X uses a Samsung-manufactured panel), OLED display technology has overcome some of its most concerning problems. LG’s phone panels might still be a different story—for now.